|
January 2003
Planning
Copyright by American Planning Association
How Aspen Does It
By Ruth Knack, AICP
What does a town do when it has 6,000 year-round residents and 30,000
"when full"? In an interview during the APA state conference in Grand
Junction, Colorado, last September, Aspen community development director Julie
Ann Woods, AICP, talked about some of the problems and solutions connected with
such an imbalance.
Providing
affordable housing is first on the list. In the mid-1970s, Aspen and surrounding
Pitkin County (permanent population 15,000) passed a landmark growth management
plan that linked growth to mitigation. A subsequent law required developers
to contribute to a housing fund that has resulted in the construction of hundreds
of for-sale "affordable" units, says Woods.
A 1993 master plan for the city proposed that 60 percent of the workforce should
be housed "upvalley" (in Aspen and Snowmass). That goal was revised
in a 2000 update; there are too many workers today to make it practical. Now
the focus is on infill development, including some 300 potential units on the
last big parcel within Aspen's boundaries.
The infill program is controversial, says Woods. One reason: a recommendation
that the city rescind the zoning "merger law" passed in the '70s.
The law was aimed at lowering density by allowing owners to build one sprawling
house on several lots, resulting in the loss of some small but historic houses.
Now the emphasis is on encouraging denser development and redevelopment. The
city is proposing a Historic TDR Program, which would allow owners of historic
properties (including cabins left over from the days when Aspen was a silver
mining center) to transfer development rights to builders.
Aspen's preservation efforts are now focused on the post-World War II ski lodges.
After hearing the old hotels dismissed as "trash," Woods hired a consultant
from Arizona who specializes in the period and who helped the planners rewrite
the historic preservation ordinance. "Now," she says, "we have
clear criteria for what makes a lodge historic, and we have a series of incentives
for saving them." The incentives include a zoning bonus for adding affordable
housing for workers.
The affordable housing incentives have worked, says Woods. Today there are
more than 1,700 deed-restricted affordable units, rental and for-sale, allowing
hundreds of workers to stay in Aspen. But there's a downside. "The high
cost of mitigation is part of the reason that we have not seen a lot of investment
in our commercial core in recent years," she says.
In response, the city initiated a downtown enhancement and pedestrian program
to carry out a variety of physical improvements. Phase one set aside $1 million
for narrowing streets, widening sidewalks, and adding amenities like benches
and brick pavers.
A second response is a revised service, commercial, and industrial zoning district,
which makes it easier for everyday service businesses to find space in the central
area. "That's to ensure that we won't continue to lose services to downvalley
communities," says Woods, "so we won't have only architects left."
In the fall of 2001, stirred to action by the September 11 terrorist attacks
and their effect on tourism, the city created an economic sustainability task
force. Local consultant Stan Clauson reported at the APA conference on the major
question the task force is seeking to answer: What should we be doing to position
Aspen for the next decade? A key trend, he noted, is the shift from a ski economy
to a real estate economy, which affects both the ski lodges and the retail sector.
Clauson said he expects the recommendations to include expansion of Aspen's
Sardy Field to accommodate regional carriers, modifying zoning to prohibit first-floor
offices in the downtown, more incentives for historic lodges, more infill housing,
the development of more locally owned retail businesses, and increased promotion
of the summer music festival. Both Clauson and Woods concluded with a reminder
of the features that make Aspen different from other resorts and the need to
preserve that difference.
Ruth Knack is the executive editor of Planning.
|